Legal Opinion

State v. Koreisl

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 13, 2011No. 90950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Koreisl,

2011-Ohio-6438.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 90950 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. MARK KOREISL DEFENDANT-APPELLANT JUDGMENT: APPLICATION DENIED Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Case No. CR-502332 Application for Re-opening Motion Nos. 449097 and 450082 RELEASE DATE: December 13, 2011 FOR APPELLANT Mark Koreisl, pro se Inmate No.: A542166 Trumbull County Correctional Inst. 5701 Burnett Leavittsburg, OH 44430 ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT William D. Mason Cuyahoga County Prosecutor By: Pinkey S.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. State v. GummOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. ReddickOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. WinsteadOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. TomlinsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  2. State v. PorterOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API