Legal Opinion

Lee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 31, 1976No. Civ. 15185PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EVANS, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from that portion of a summary judgment which declared valid provisions in automobile insurance policies issued by defendant requiring plaintiffs to reimburse defendant for certain medical payments received by plaintiffs pursuant to the insurance agreement.

Defendant appeals from that portion of the judgment which required it to pay a pro rata share of attorney’s fees incurred by plaintiffs in securing a settlement or recovery out of which the reimbursement was required.

The following facts are not in dispute: from May 1965, through and including February 1968,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Quinn v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Peri v. L.A. Junction Ry.California Supreme Court · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. U.S. Airways, Inc. v. McCutchenSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Progressive West Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Samura v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Barnes v. Independent Automobile Dealers Ass'n of California Health & Welfare Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. City and County of San Francisco v. SweetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API