Legal Opinion
Haworth v. Elliott
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 28, 1944No. Civ. 14630PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
The question for decision is whether the evidence supports the findings that (1) the employees of a •barkeeper caused the injuries of plaintiff by the wrongful application of excessive force in ejecting him from the barroom and, (2) if so, whether they were acting within the scope of their employment.
On December 18, 1943, plaintiff in company with his wife and some friends entered a barroom operated by defendant Elliott. While there plaintiff became involved in a quarrel with another invitee. Defendants Collier and Symington, bartenders for Elliott, leaped over the bar and began their efforts…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Deevy v. TassiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Ryder v. BambergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Erreca v. Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rodgers v. Kemper Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- DeMirjian v. Ideal Heating Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- McMurtry v. State Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Novick v. GouldsberryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Person v. Children's Hospital National Medical CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.