Jones v. Wickstrom
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.
This action is one to foreclose a contractor’s lien and recover a balance claimed to be due in the sum of $2,757.88 on the construction of an apartment house in the city of Los Angeles. Defendant in her answer sets up the defense that the contract was procured by plaintiff through fraud and misrepresentation; that plaintiff represented that he was a licensed architect and a builder of skill and efficiency, when in truth and in fact he was not a licensed architect, nor had he at the time of entering into the contract—February 3, 1923—any experience in the building of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tatterson v. KehrleinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Winterburn v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Payne v. De VaughnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Weissich v. BehrensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Meads, Seaman & Co. v. LasarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Joseph v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Cash v. BlackettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Live Oak Cemetery Assn. v. AdamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Clark v. EadsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Baer v. TippettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.