Meads, Seaman & Co. v. Lasar
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Monterey County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Action of claim and delivery of certain persona] property in the possession of the defendant Graves, as sheriff of Monterey County, under an attachment issued in an action brought by the defendant Lasar against certain vendors of the plaintiffs.
The plaintiffs were creditors of the firm of S. Houghton & Sons to the amount of several thousand dollars, and on May 21,1888, bought from them certain personal property, consisting of hogs, horses, and other cattle, including that described in the complaint, taking from them a bill of sale therefor, and crediting the agreed price upon their account…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Winterburn v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Godchaux v. MulfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Claudius v. AguirreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Etchepare v. AguirreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Nelson v. HighlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by17 opinions
- A. W. Swope & Son v. Burnham, Hanna, Munger & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Andrews v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. National Funding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- In re Farmers' Supply Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1909
- Smith v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.