Legal Opinion
Baer v. Tippett
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 28, 1939No. Civ. 2311PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal following an order granting a motion for a non-suit.
On November 24, 1936, the parties to the action entered into a written contract in which the plaintiffs agreed to prepare plans and specifications, to act in the capacity of architects and to construct a residence and other buildings for the defendant. The preparation of the plans proceeded for several months and up to May 1, 1937, on which date certain changes therein were made. Shortly thereafter, the defendant requested a radical change in the terms of the-agreement, which request was refused…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Berka v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Payne v. De VaughnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Binford v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- People v. Allied Architects Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Jones v. WickstromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Joseph v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Dick Weatherston's Associated Mechanical Services, Inc. v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Rasa Engineering Corp. v. DaubónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
- Felix v. ZlotoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Medak v. CoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.