Legal Opinion
American Safety Device Co. v. Kurland Chemical Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 8, 1934No. 108PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff owns, and brought this suit for the infringement of, two patents, viz., No. 1,164,587 to Faulkner, December 14, 1915, and No. 1,388,262 to Johnston, August 23, 1921. The second patent is not involved in this appeal. The first expired after the suit was brought. The facts were stipulated. So far as now material they are as follows:
During the life of the patent (No. 1,164,-587) the defendant Harry Kurland constructed twenty-four machines which infringed. Twelve of them have been used and the remainder have not. They have all been in the possession of defendant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rice & Adams Corp. v. LathropSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Underwood Typewriter Co. v. Elliott-Fisher Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907
- American Diamond Rock Boring Co. v. SheldonUnited States Circuit Court · 1880
- Fulton Co. v. Bishop & Babcock Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
- Johnson v. Brooklyn & C. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1888
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Julius E. Foster v. American MacHine & Foundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- American Metropolitan Enterprises of New York, Inc. v. Warner Bros. Records, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- CONDENSER CORPORATION, ETC. v. Micamold Radio Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- American Metropolitan Enterprises Of New York, Inc. v. Warner Bros. Records, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Nerney v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.