Legal Opinion

American Diamond Rock Boring Co. v. Sheldon

United States Circuit Court

Decided February 15, 1880PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

A motion for a rehearing has been filed since the decree for an injunction and an account, in support of which counsel for the defendants have submitted a brief; and a motion to restore the injunction as to machines made during the life of the patent infringing upon it has been heard. The motion for rehearing rests entirely upon the ground that the decision made is, as is alleged, for many reasons erroneous, and is supported by the certificate .of two counsel.

The English practice of granting a rehearing upon the certificate of two counsel, as a matter of course, does not prevail in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. Aspden's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  2. Jenkins v. EldredgeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1845
  3. United States v. Knight's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  4. Public Schools v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  5. Daniel v. MitchellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1840

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fulton Co. v. Bishop & Babcock Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
  2. American Safety Device Co. v. Kurland Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  3. Wright's Automatic Tobacco Packing Mach. Co. v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1915
  4. American Diamond Rock Boring Co. v. SheldonUnited States Circuit Court · 1879
  5. American Sulphite Pulp Co. v. Crown-Columbia Pulp & Paper Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API