Legal Opinion

Rice & Adams Corp. v. Lathrop

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 18, 1929No. 155PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland

The question here to be determined arose in a suit in equity by respondent against petitioner, brought in the federal district court for the Western District of New York, for infringement of a patent. The bill ¿alleged repeated and continuing infringement of the patent by petitioner, preparation and readiness to continue such infringement, and that unless petitioner was restrained respondent would suffer great and irreparable damage, etc. It was further alleged that in a prior suit for infringement, brought by respondent against the Bowman Dairy Company, the patent hád been sustained as valid…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Greene v. Louisville & Interurban RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Thomson v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Root v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. McGowan v. ParishSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Clark v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. TEXAS v. FLORIDA Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Alabama v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Oklahoma Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co. v. Shelley Knitting Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API