Legal Opinion
Fulton Co. v. Bishop & Babcock Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 8, 1927No. 4490, 4491PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
After careful review, we are satisfied with the disposition of this case made by the District Judge, and approve his treatment of the questions involved. We have held the case an unduly long time, in the expectation that we would be able to give the case a somewhat independent treatment; but it seems impracticable to do so. We therefore approve the opinion below, in which will be found a full statement as to the patents and the questions involved.
Prom the fact that the product patent is held not infringed, we cannot draw the inference which the defendant now urges upon us. The new product…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Merrill v. YeomansSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Underwood Typewriter Co. v. Elliott-Fisher Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907
- American Diamond Rock Boring Co. v. SheldonUnited States Circuit Court · 1880
- Toledo Mower & Reaper Co. v. Johnston Harvester Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1885
- New York Belting & Packing Co. v. MagowanUnited States Circuit Court · 1886
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Warner v. Tennessee Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
- Barber-Colman Co. v. National Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
- American Safety Device Co. v. Kurland Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Perkins Glue Co. v. Holland Furniture Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
- Bishop & Babcock Mfg. Co. v. Fulton Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.