Legal Opinion

Brunmeier v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 15, 1973No. 43379PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

The issue raised on this appeal is whether a provision in an automobile insurance policy which reduces uninsured-motorist coverage by amounts paid for workmen’s compensation is contrary to public policy. The trial court held the provision invalid and we affirm.

Plaintiff is a trustee for Brian Bellrichard who was killed in a two-car collision with an uninsured motorist, Max Naiman, on November 20, 1968. In an action brought by the trustee against Naiman for death by wrongful act, she secured a judgment for $35,000. Decedent at the time of his death was covered by an automobile…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ullman v. Wolverine InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Stephens v. Allied Mutual Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Aldcroft v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  5. Peterson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1964

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Wasche v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Cole v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  3. McClure v. Employers Mutual Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  4. Halseth v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Lick v. Dairyland Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API