Scott v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.
Smith, J., dissents and files a dissenting opinion at page 656 infra.
Here we are called upon again to determine whether the procedure followed by a trial court at sentencing violated a defendant’s rights to his prejudice.
The facts of this case can be stated succinctly. The appellant was convicted in a non-jury trial in the Criminal Court *649of Baltimore of a sexual offense in the first degree. Thereafter, the trial judge ordered a presentence investigation and a medical examination. Results of these investigations were reported in writing and copies were supplied to defendant’s counsel and the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hillard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- State v. RaithelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Kent v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Scott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
3Cited by29 opinions
- Jefferson-El v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Bundy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Young v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.