Hughes v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Murphy, C. J., and Rodowsky, J., dissent. Murphy, C. J., filed a dissenting opinion at page 230 infra, in which Rodowsky, J., concurs.
We are concerned in this case with the interplay between Maryland Rule 724 stating, with exceptions not here applicable, "[t]he defendant shall be present at every stage of the trial” and Rule 746 b providing that once a trial date in a criminal case has been set any change of date must be "[u]pon motion of a party made in writing or in open court and for extraordinary cause shown [to the satisfaction of] the county administrative judge dr a judge designated by…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Midgett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Henry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Colvin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Bedford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.