Legal Opinion

Hughes v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 12, 1980No. [No. 122, September Term, 1979.]PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Murphy, C. J., and Rodowsky, J., dissent. Murphy, C. J., filed a dissenting opinion at page 230 infra, in which Rodowsky, J., concurs.

We are concerned in this case with the interplay between Maryland Rule 724 stating, with exceptions not here applicable, "[t]he defendant shall be present at every stage of the trial” and Rule 746 b providing that once a trial date in a criminal case has been set any change of date must be "[u]pon motion of a party made in writing or in open court and for extraordinary cause shown [to the satisfaction of] the county administrative judge dr a judge designated by…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  5. Midgett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. Henry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. Colvin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. Bedford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API