Legal Opinion

Hillard v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 5, 1979No. [No. 133, September Term, 1978.]PublishedCited by 126 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.

The question posed for our consideration in this criminal cause is whether petitioner Samuel Hillard’s inculpatory statement was prompted by improper police inducement, thereby rendering its admission as evidence prejudicial error, requiring the reversal of his conviction in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County for using a handgun in the commission of a felony. Md. Code (1957, 1976 Repl. Vol.), Art. 27, § 3613(d). The trial court and the Court of Special Appeals found the statement in question to have been voluntarily made and thus properly admitted; however, we conclude that…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Payne v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Harrison v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. Ross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by126 opinions

  1. Tichnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  2. Trusty v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. Ball v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. State v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  5. Burch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API