Bundy v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
CHASANOW, Judge.
We granted Melvin Bundy’s petition for a writ of certiorari to consider whether Bundy adequately preserved for appellate review his contention that the trial judge erroneously permitted the State to exercise more than four peremptory challenges. In Bundy’s appeal to the Court of Special Appeals, the intermediate appellate court first opined that the State was entitled to only four peremptory challenges in the consolidated trial of Bundy and a codefendant. See Maryland Code (1974, 1989 Repl.Vol.), Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, § 8 — 301(d) (providing that, in cases…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Georgia v. McCollumSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Stanley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Baker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Whitney v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- In Re Emileigh F.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Ray-Simmons & McGouldrick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Simon v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.