Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 13, 1999No. 51, Sept. Term, 1998PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATHELL, Judge.

The conduct of the presiding trial judge in this case requires us to reverse petitioner’s criminal conviction. 1 Petitioner asks us to determine whether a “presumption of prejudice” is created by inappropriate conduct such as the conduct that occurred in this case or whether a stricter standard of “actual prejudice” must be demonstrated before a reversal is warranted. Because we believe petitioner suffered actual prejudice at his trial below, we shall not address whether a “presumption of prejudice” would exist.

BACKGROUND

We first shall review briefly the facts leading up to the…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Bryant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Dempsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. Delo v. NewlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Board of Medical Examiners v. StewardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kelly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Diggs and Ramsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  3. Butler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Drake v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  5. United States v. Márquez-PérezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API