Legal Opinion

Myers v. Reinstein

California Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1885No. 8730PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

This action was brought to establish a resulting trust in a parcel of land claimed to have been purchased by S. H. Collins and M. Reinstein—the latter, testator of defendants O. Reinstein and A. Vaenberg—when partners, and paid for with partnership funds. The parcel had been conveyed to M. Reinstein. The action was brought by. plaintiff as the assignee of Collins. Judgment passed for plaintiff. Defendants moved for a new trial, which was denied, and they prosecute this appeal from the judgment and order denying the new trial.

Collins, as stated above, the assignor of plaintiff and the partner…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fallon v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. In re McCAUSLANDCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Wadleigh v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Calmon v. SarrailleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Estate of Dutard v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Fish v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Poulson v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API