Legal Opinion
Crellin v. Van Duzer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 10, 1944PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCurn, J.
These actions are to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant Van Duzer in the operation of his automobile.
The fourth paragraph of the complaint in each action alleges:
“ That at the time of the accident the defendant Benjamin F. Van Duzer was employed by the defendant Prudential Insurance Company of America and was operating his automobile in the course of such employment and in furtherance of the business of the Prudential Insurance Company of America.”
*746The answers of the defendant Van Duzer do not deny said allegation. The answers…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Manufacturers Trust Co. v. American National Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Angell v. BoothNew York Supreme Court · 1938
- Kozuch v. BachmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- La Bonte v. Long Island RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Mayer v. New York Canners, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lyon v. Fieldgren Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1948
- De Maria v. GaidusekNew York Supreme Court · 1946
- Kraushaar v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Erdenbrecher v. ErdenbrecherNew York Supreme Court · 1946
- In re the Probate of the Will of EggerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.