Legal Opinion

Kozuch v. Bachmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 12, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUntermyer, J.

This appeal presents the single question whether a defendant may be examined as a party before trial even though *251he has defaulted by failing to appear or answer the complaint. The court at Special Term by denying a motion made by the appellants to vacate the plaintiff’s notice of examination, has held that the examination is proper notwithstanding the default.

The action is in equity by a stockholder suing in his own behalf and in behalf of all other stockholders of Bachmann, Emmerich & Co., Inc., to require the individual defendants to account to the corporation for alleged misconduct…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Welsh v. Cowles Shipyard Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Grennan v. ColesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Reynolds Securities, Inc. v. Underwriters Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Crellin v. Van DuzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  3. Glens Falls Insurance v. WeissNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Foote v. Joseph Bisceglia & Sons, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1948
  5. In re the Probate of the Will of GehlertNew York Surrogate's Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API