Legal Opinion
Erdenbrecher v. Erdenbrecher
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 14, 1946PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.
The intervening defendant, James W. Kelleher, moves to examine the defendant Charles Q-. Erdenbreeher before trial on the intervener’s affirmative defenses.
The intervener aiid the plaintiff were once husband and wife, but were divorced in the State of New Jersey on July 29,1935. By the terms of the decree, the intervener was directed to pay $200 monthly for the support and maintenance of the plaintiff and two infant children of the marriage. Thereafter, and on September 1, 1944, plaintiff married the defendant herein, but did not advise the intervener of that fact, and continued to accept the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Public National Bank v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Nixon v. Beacon Transportation Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Crellin v. Van DuzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Zirn v. BradleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- La Bonte v. Long Island RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Reynolds Securities, Inc. v. Underwriters Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Glens Falls Insurance v. WeissNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Mook v. MookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- Vicherek v. PapanekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953