Legal Opinion
De Maria v. Gaidusek
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 14, 1946PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeyo, J.
The motion for the examination of the defendant is granted as to Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10, and is denied as to Items 7, 9 11 and 12, as set forth in the notice of motion. The defendant’s motion for an examination of the plaintiff is granted as to Items 1, 2, including the names and addresses of any of *341the plaintiff's companions who may have participated in the alleged brawl, 3, 4 and 5 of the cross motion.
The examination of John Kushner and Frank Monico, which the plaintiff seeks, may not be had under the papers as now presented. They may be examined merely as witnesses. Under section…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pardee v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Town of Hancock v. . First National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Victor G. Bloede Co. v. J. P. Devine Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Reif v. GebelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Crellin v. Van DuzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Limerick v. FitzgeraldNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- In re the Probate of the Will of EggerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1947
- People ex rel. Glasier v. GlasierNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- De Maria v. GaidusekNew York Supreme Court · 1946
- Elmi v. ElmiNew York Supreme Court · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.