Legal Opinion
Angell v. Booth
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 31, 1938PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPersonius, J.
This action is brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff while riding in a car owned by the defendant Irving D. Booth and driven by his son, Irving D. Booth, Jr. The complaint alleges that the car was driven with the knowledge and consent of the defendant. This is denied in the answer. The plaintiff has given notice of examination of the defendant owner and of his son, the driver of the car, on the issue of the defendant’s knowledge and consent. The defendant now moves to vacate said notice.
The plaintiff is entitled to examine the defendant. (Sturckler v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Town of Hancock v. . First National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Bartlett v. SanfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Manufacturers Trust Co. v. American National Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Stevens v. SilvermanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935
- Sturckler v. LuxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Crellin v. Van DuzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- In re the Probate of the Will of CarllNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
- De Maria v. GaidusekNew York Supreme Court · 1946
- In re the Probate of the Will of EggerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1947
- In re the Probate of the Will of EschenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.