Legal Opinion

Merryman v. Sears

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1937No. Civil No. 3877PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The plaintiff, W. P. Sears, brought this action on February 10, 1936, against the defendant, Holland Merryman, on her promissory note for $14, 900, dated August 1, 1928, bearing interest at 8 per cent, per annum and payable on or before five years after date, as modified by an agreement dated March 31, 1933, extending the time of payment to April 1, 1934, reducing the principal to $12,000 and the interest to 6 per cent, per annum, and to foreclose a real estate mortgage given by defendant as security to the note.

The defendant by her second amended answer admits giving the note and mortgage to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United Iron Works v. Outer Harbor Dock & Wharf Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Schuster v. SchusterArizona Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Bradford Investment Co. v. JoostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. S. H. Kress & Co. v. EvansArizona Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Gage v. PhillipsNevada Supreme Court · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dykeman v. AshtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  2. Daru v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  3. City of Tucson v. O'Rielly Motor Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Oberan v. Western MacHinery Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Tidwell v. RiggsArizona Supreme Court · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API