State v. Williams
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Pee CuRiAM.
The appellant does not contend the State’s evidence was insufficient to carry the case to the jury and to support the verdict.
The appellant assigns as error, however, the failure of the court below to arrest judgment for that the bill of indictment was fatally defective in that it failed to allege one of the requisite elements of the crime of robbery, to wit, the taking with felonious intent to convert the personal property allegedly stolen to defendant’s own use.
Robbery at common law is defined as the felonious taking of money or goods of any value from the person of another in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- State v. . LunsfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- State v. ChaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- State v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. . BurkeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. WessonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. FrietchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.