State v. Harris
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice.
Defendant first assigns as error the refusal of the trial court to quash the bill of indictment for the reason that the grand jury panel and the trial jury panel excluded persons between the ages of eighteen and twenty-one. Defendant did not offer any evidence to show a systematic exclusion from the jury panel of persons falling within this age group. From the record we do not know that they were excluded. State v. Brinson, 277 N.C. 286, 177 S.E. 2d 398 (1970); State v. Spencer, 276 N.C. 535, 173 S.E. 2d 765 (1970). Assuming however that they were excluded, prior to 21 July…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. WigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. RivensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. JarrettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.