Legal Opinion

State v. . Lunsford

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 22, 1948PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEbvin, J.

The defendants emphasize their exceptions to the charge. They insist, among other things, that the trial judge erred in failing to instruct the jury as to the felonious intent essential to the crime of robbery, and in restricting the jury to the return of either a verdict of guilty of robbery or a verdict of not guilty. The record presently presented compels us to concede that the position of the defendants in these respects is well taken.

Writers upon criminal law' often suggest that robbery is merely an aggravated form of larceny. 54 C. J., Eobbery, section 11. It has been defined with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lewis v. . WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. State v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. State v. . BurkeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  4. State v. . KirklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. State v. . SowlsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1867

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. Marshall Norman HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. Charles Phillips BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. State v. SprattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API