State v. Young
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.
The defendant first argues that his conviction for larceny from the person is invalid because that offense is not a lesser included offense of common law robbery governed by N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15-170. We disagree.
While larceny from the person does carry the same penalty as common law robbery, the North Carolina courts have treated larceny from the person as a lesser included offense. See State v. McLawhorn, 43 N.C. App. 695, 260 S.E. 2d 138 (1979), disc. rev. denied 299 N.C. 123, 261 S.E. 2d 925 (1980). In State v. Kirk, 17 N.C. App. 68, 193 S.E. 2d 377 (1972), the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. FletcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Clarke v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- People v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sanders v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- All States Steel Erectors Corp. and Travelers Casualty and Surety Co. v. Terry L. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.