Legal Opinion

Farrington v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 27, 1979PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, J.

On April 26, 1974, the defendant William E. Leary applied for and received a permit to construct a building to be used in connection with his boat rental and storage business, located on property in the village of Noank, town of Croton. On that date the use of the proposed building for its intended purpose was a permitted use. Effective June 22, 1974, however, the Noank zoning regulations were amended, as a result of which the intended use of Leary’s proposed building became thereafter a prohibited use. Section 13.2.2 1 of the Noank zoning regulations, however, provides specifically for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Calandro v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. Abel v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  3. M. & R. ENTERPRISES, INC. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  4. Berlani v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  5. Laurel Beach Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Torsiello v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  4. R & R Pool & Patio, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  5. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API