Legal Opinion
Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 16, 1982PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the trial court reversing the defendant’s (hereinafter commission) denial of the plaintiff’s (hereinafter company) application for subdivision approval of certain property located on Fodor Lane (now Oakview Drive) in Trumbull, to permit the use of those premises as conforming building lots.
The factual circumstances are undisputed: In 1970, the company acquired some thirty-seven and one-half acres of land; of these, approximately thirty acres were zoned Industrial IL-2, and the remaining seven and one-half acres were zoned Residential A. Shortly…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Whittaker v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Kutcher v. Town Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Summ v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Stiles v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- McCrann v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Smith v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Town of OrangeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Carofano v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Property Group, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.