Weisse v. City of Detroit
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This action was brought to recover damages for injuries received by reason of a defective crosswalk in the city of Detroit. Plaintiff recovered verdict *483and judgment for $500 in the court below. Defendant brings error.
The declaration alleged that the plaintiff, while passing along the street, in the evening of April 22, 1892, fell by reason of a defect in the cross-walk, which was caused by the end of a plank, which was lengthwise in the crosswalk, being loose, and being raised up above the walk some two inches or more. The plaintiff testified that the plank was up about one and one-half…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Malloy v. Township of WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Bigelow v. City of KalamazooMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Miller v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Schroth v. City of PrescottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by30 opinions
- Glancy v. City of RosevilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Baxter v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Jackson v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Miller v. Village of MullanIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
- Northrup v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.