Legal Opinion
Burno v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 7, 2008No. 97-CF-1698, 06-CO-488PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge, Retired:
A jury convicted appellant (Burno) of armed assault with intent to rob, assault with a dangerous weapon, and related weapons offenses, crediting evidence that he had shot uniformed police officer Gerald Anderson in the neck in September 1995 while intending to rob the officer of his Glock service pistol.
Burno’s main argument on appeal is that the trial court erred in not suppressing his videotaped confession, because police detectives (a) ignored what he contends was an unambiguous assertion of his right to end the custodial interrogation, or (b) failed to…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dorsey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Ingram v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- United States v. HamidullinDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- Burno v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Dorsey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.