Dorsey v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1ConcurrenceThompson, Associate Judge
I join Judge Reid’s thoughtful and careful opinion. I write separately to explain why — having viewed in their entirety the over thirteen hours of DVDs of Mr. Dorsey in the interrogation room, and being fully mindful of our measure of review, see ante at 227 — I am satisfied with Judge Reid’s conclusion that Mr. Dorsey’s confession was voluntary.
I agree with Judge Reid that Mr. Dorsey demonstrated throughout his ordeal, from about 7:20 p.m. on May 7 until about 9:15 a.m. on May 8, that he could not be pressured into confession through the tactics that the detectives used. Mr. Dorsey, who…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lyons v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Dennis Rosa Collazo v. Wayne Estelle, Warden, California Mens ColonyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Daniel Holland v. Kenneth McGinnis Warden, and Michael P. Lane, Director, Illinois Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.