Dorsey v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
Appellant James Dorsey was convicted after a jury trial of assaulting and robbing an elderly street vendor.1 The videotape of Dorsey’s confession, introduced at his trial by the prosecution in its case-in-chief, was the most compelling evidence against him. In this appeal, Dorsey contends the trial court erred in admitting the confession.
While he was in police custody, Dorsey endured a grueling overnight interrogation during which, as the government concedes, detectives violated the rules of Miranda v. Arizona2 and Edwards v. Arizona3 by continuing to press him to…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- ERIC GARDNER v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- McCray v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Adams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2017
- IN RE S.W.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- People v. MandolineAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.