Legal Opinion

Dorsey v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 3, 2013No. 06-CF-1099PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:

Appellant James Dorsey was convicted after a jury trial of assaulting and robbing an elderly street vendor.1 The videotape of Dorsey’s confession, introduced at his trial by the prosecution in its case-in-chief, was the most compelling evidence against him. In this appeal, Dorsey contends the trial court erred in admitting the confession.

While he was in police custody, Dorsey endured a grueling overnight interrogation during which, as the government concedes, detectives violated the rules of Miranda v. Arizona2 and Edwards v. Arizona3 by continuing to press him to…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. ERIC GARDNER v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. McCray v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Adams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2017
  4. IN RE S.W.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. People v. MandolineAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API