Legal Opinion

Ingram v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 23, 2009No. 06-CF-668PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REID, Associate Judge:

We previously remanded this case for further proceedings regarding a contention by appellant, Darion J. Ingram, that the trial court erred by failing to admit into evidence an alleged statement against penal interest made by a third party, Jameel Aleem. See Ingram v. United States, 885 A.2d 257 (D.C.2005) (Ingram I). Following an evidentiary hearing on remand, the trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law, and again excluded Mr. Aleem’s statement to Mr. Ingram’s trial counsel confessing that he shot the victim. Mr. Ingram once again challenges the trial…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. United States v. David Guillette and Robert JoostCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chamontae A. Walker & Corey D. Yates v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Miller v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Miller v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API