Legal Opinion

Epstein v. Coastal Timber Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 11, 2011No. 26997PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beatty

Albert Epstein (“Epstein”) brought this action for damages against Coastal Timber Co., Inc. (“Coastal”), alleging Coastal cut and removed standing timber that was subject to mortgages he held on the property. The circuit court found Epstein failed to properly secure an interest in the timber under South Carolina’s Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”). Epstein appeals. We reverse and remand.

I. FACTS

In March 2004, Epstein purchased real property in Horry County from TMAC Investors IX, L.L.C. for $130,000.00. The deed was recorded on April 19, 2004. The area, known as the old Conway Mill site,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Charleston County School District v. State Budget & Control BoardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Hooper v. Ebenezer Senior Services & Rehabilitation CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  3. Media General Communications, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. Major v. National Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  5. Manios v. Nelson, Mullins, Riley & Scarborough, LLPCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Grier v. Amisub of South Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  2. Johnson v. Robert E. Lee Academy, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  3. South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Michelle G.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  4. Eades v. Palmetto Cardiovascular & Thoracic, PASupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
  5. Ross v. Waccamaw Community HospitalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API