Legal Opinion

United States v. Harris

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided January 22, 1981No. ACM 22770PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

MILES, Judge:

Consistent with his pleas, the accused was convicted of making a false official statement, seven specifications of larceny, and one offense of making a worthless draft in violation of Articles 107, 121 and 123a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C.A. §§ 907, 921, 923a. The approved sentence extends to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for one year, forfeiture of $100.00 per month for twelve months and reduction to airman basic.

Appellate defense counsel assert that the military judge erred by disallowing a challenge for cause thereby…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United States v. DeainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. ParkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  4. United States v. TippitUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  5. United States v. McGowanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. DavenportU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
  3. United States v. CastlemanU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
  4. United States v. DawdyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
  5. United States v. JobsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API