United States v. Harris
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
MILES, Judge:
Consistent with his pleas, the accused was convicted of making a false official statement, seven specifications of larceny, and one offense of making a worthless draft in violation of Articles 107, 121 and 123a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C.A. §§ 907, 921, 923a. The approved sentence extends to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for one year, forfeiture of $100.00 per month for twelve months and reduction to airman basic.
Appellate defense counsel assert that the military judge erred by disallowing a challenge for cause thereby…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. DeainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. ParkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. TippitUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. McGowanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. HarrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. DavenportU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. CastlemanU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
- United States v. DawdyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
- United States v. JobsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.