Legal Opinion
Mulcahy v. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society
California Supreme Court
Decided July 25, 1904No. S.F. No. 2454PublishedCited by 8 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
Plaintiff in his own behalf, and on behalf of others similarly situated, alleging that he, and they, are members of said society, brings this action to compel the distribution of a portion of the reserve fund of said society among its members."
It is alleged that said fund amounts to $2,500,000, and plaintiff seeks to have all but $750,000 thereof so distributed.
Defendants demurred to said„complaint on various grounds, many of which were sustained, and, plaintiff declining to amend, a judgment dismissing the action was entered. From this judgment he appeals.
One of the grounds upon which the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Williams v. . Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Excelsior Water & Mining Co. v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Reynolds v. Bank of Mt. VernonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HenleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ShrumIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
3Cited by8 opinions
- First Industrial Loan Co. v. DaughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Gaines v. Long Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Richards v. Pacific Southwest Discount Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Gaines v. Long Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Morrison v. State Bank of WheatlandWyoming Supreme Court · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.