Legal Opinion

Excelsior Water & Mining Co. v. Pierce

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1891No. 12973PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

— This is an action by a California corporation against one of its former directors to recover the amount of certain dividends declared and paid to its stockholders with the concurrence of the defendant while a director. It is alleged by the plaintiff that such dividends were not paid out of the surplus profits of its business, and the action is based upon the provisions of section 309 of the Civil Code, which reads as follows: —

*136“Sec. 309. The directors of corporations must not make dividends, except from the surplus profits arising from the business thereof; nor must they divide, withdraw,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Minot v. PaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Williams v. . Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1883

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Burne v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Zellerbach v. AllenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Butler v. New Keystone Copper CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1915
  4. Tapscott v. Mexican Colo. River Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Von Baumbach v. Sargent Land Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API