Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Shrum

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 1899No. 2,935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Erom the Montgomery Circuit Oourt.

1Opinion of the CourtComstock, C. J.

The complaint in this cause is substantially as follows: The appellee filed a claim in the commissioners’ court of Montgomery county, Indiana, on behalf of divers taxpayers of Union township, in said county, asking therein that certain money known as the fund for the purchase of toll roads be paid and returned to the several taxpayers who had paid the same; that defendant was among those to whom a portion of said fund was due; that, prior to the filing of said claim by the appellee, an effort was being made and arrangements being effected on the part of certain persons to have this fund…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Taggart v. TevannyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Bartholomew v. JacksonNew York Supreme Court · 1822
  3. Cunningham v. ReardonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  4. Warring v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Dunbar v. WilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 1813

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Re Faling EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Estate of Anderson v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Mulcahy v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Cover v. CookerlyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API