Reynolds v. Bank of Mt. Vernon
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, James L. Reynolds, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the cleric of the county of Westchester on the 26th day of February, 1894, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Westchester Special Term.
1Opinion of the Court
Cullen, J.:
The. plain tiff is a stockholder of the defendant the Bank of Mount Vernon, and the defendant' G-ouverneur Rogers is the president of that corporation. The complaint alleges that the defendant Rogers, with.certain associates who hold a majority of the stock of the bank, have for years controlled its management and conduct. Such conduct and management the complaint alleges to have been illegal and fraudulent, in many respects particularly stated. The action is brought by the plaintiff for himself and all other stockholders, to obtain redress for these grievances. It will be more…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kent v. . Quicksilver Mining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Williams v. . Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Hanover National Bank v. American Dock & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Bank of New York National Banking Ass'n v. American Dock & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Driscoll v. . West Bradley C.M. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- First Industrial Loan Co. v. DaughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Hassel v. PohleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Rafe v. HindinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Nauss v. Nauss Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Mulcahy v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.