Legal Opinion
Alvarez v. Keystone Plus Construction Corporation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 11, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-0602PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs Jose Alvarez and Juan Jose Alvarez (“Plaintiffs”) have sued Defendants Keystone Plus Construction Corporation (“Keystone”) and its owner Carlos Perdomo (together, “Defendants”), on behalf of themselves and similarly situated individuals, claiming that the company’s policies with respect to compensation for overtime work performed in connection with a specific construction project violated the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201-19; the District of Columbia Minimum Wage Revision Act, D.C. Code § 31-1001-15;…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Evans v. Jeff D. Ex Rel. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Coleman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- In Re: Navy ChaplaincyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Ross v. Lockheed Martin Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Cromeans v. Morgan Keegan & Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2014
- Greenberg v. ColvinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.