Legal Opinion

Stephens v. Farmers Rest. Grp.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 31, 2018No. Civil Action No. 17–1087 (TJK)PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMOTHY J. KELLY, United States District Judge

Plaintiffs, eight current and former servers at five restaurants operated by Defendants, claim that Defendants violated *100federal and state laws concerning the minimum wage, overtime pay, and sick leave. In the instant motion,1 Plaintiffs seek conditional certification of an opt-in collective action under federal and D.C. law. For reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part. Conditional certification will be granted, with the following limitations:

First, the putative class is limited to servers.

Second,…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Campbell-Ewald Co. v. GomezSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Myers v. Hertz Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  5. Lundy v. Catholic Health System of Long Island Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Meyer v. Panera Bread Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. Camara v. Mastro's Rests. LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. Harris v. Med. Transp. Mgmt., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Bradley v. Vox Media, Inc..District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
  5. Camara v. Mastros Restaurants LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API