Legal Opinion
Ayala v. Tito Contractors, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 6, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-1603PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs are laborers who performed construction and carpentry work for Defendant Tito Contractors at various project sites in the Washington metropolitan area. They brought this action against Tito and its owner seeking unpaid overtime wages under the Fair Labor Stan dards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 207. Plaintiffs now file this Motion for Conditional Class Certification under the FLSA’s “collective action” provision, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), attempting to create a conditional class of current and former Tito laborers. Defendants oppose,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Myers v. Hertz Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Lundy v. Catholic Health System of Long Island Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Morgan v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Grayson v. K Mart Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Stephens v. Farmers Rest. Grp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Meyer v. Panera Bread Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Freeman v. Medstar Health Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Camara v. Mastro's Rests. LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Galloway v. Chugach Government Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.