Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Hudson River Aggregates, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 14, 1981No. 327, Docket 80-4114PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OAKES, Circuit Judge:
This case, having as its principal issue whether an employer was properly treated as a successor, is here on a petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order issued against Hudson River Aggregates, Inc. (HRA), on October 22, 1979. The Board, substantially adopting the recommended order of the Administrative Law Judge, directed HRA to cease and desist from certain unfair labor practices and to take affirmative steps to remedy its statutory violations. We grant the petition for enforcement.
FACTS
In early 1978 HRA bought two stone quarries, one…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Executive BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- South Prairie Construction Co. v. Local No. 627, International Union of Operating EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Zim's Foodliner, Inc., D/B/A Zim's Iga Foodliner, and S&o, Inc., D/B/A Paul's Iga Foodliner v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Premium Foods, Incorporated, and v. National Labor Relations Board, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Rivcom Corp. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sage Realty Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jeffries Lithograph Company, a Subsidiary of Ticor Printing Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.