Legal Opinion
Rivcom Corp. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board
California Supreme Court
Decided October 17, 1983No. S.F. 24520PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRODIN, J.
Rivcom Corporation (Rivcom), its parent Riverbend Farms, Inc. (Riverbend), and Triple M. Farms, Inc. (Triple M) petition for review of a decision of the Agricultural Labor Relations Board (Board) that the first two companies (collectively the growers) committed acts prohibited by section 1153, subdivisions (a), (c), and (e) of the Agricultural Labor Relations Act of 1975 (ALRA or Act) (Lab. Code, § 1140 et seq.). The findings under subdivisions (a) and (c)1 are that the growers, as new operators of a large citrus farm in Ventura County, sought to avoid unionization by…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Regents of University of California v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Salas v. Sierra Chemical Co.California Supreme Court · 2014
- Halaco Engineering Co. v. South Central Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Harry Carian Sales v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.