Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Executive Board
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall
Once again we are faced with the problem of defining the labor law obligations of a “successor” employer to the employees of its predecessors. In this case, petitioner Howard Johnson Co. is the bona fide purchaser of the assets of a restaurant and motor lodge. Respondent Union was the bargaining representative of the employees of the previous operators, and had successfully concluded collective-bargaining agreements with them. In commencing its operation of the restaurant, Howard Johnson hired only a small fraction of the predecessors' employees. The question presented in this case is whether…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Golden State Bottling Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by464 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & BildiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lodge 76, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Carbon Fuel Co. v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
459 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.