Legal Opinion

Edwards v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 2, 2008No. 07SC279PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bender

Introduction

In this case we review the court of appeals' decision in People v. Edwards, 165 P.3d 904 (Colo.App.2007).1 In that case, the court of appeals dismissed as moot Petitioner Joseph Edwards' request to have his presentence confinement credit ("PSCC") applied to the mandatory parole portion of his sentence. That court held that because Edwards was serving mandatory parole at the time of his appeal, rather than the confinement portion of his sentence, Colorado's PSCC statute did not apply. Edwards, 165 P.3d at 906-07.

We reverse. We hold that an offender who has earned PSCC is entitled…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Martin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. Craig v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. People v. LutherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. People v. CrossSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  5. People v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. v. BakerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
  2. Diehl v. WeiserSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
  3. In re MirandaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
  4. People v. RoyColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. People v. HoweColorado Court of Appeals · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API