Legal Opinion

Fierro v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 27, 2009No. 07SC788PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Coats

Fierro petitioned for review of the court of appeals' judgment declaring illegal her three-year sentence to community corrections and remanding for imposition of her previously suspended four-year sentence for robbery. Although the sentencing court had initially placed Fierro on probation, it did so by imposing and suspending a prison term. The court of appeals held that because probation was imposed as a condition of a suspended sentence, the sentencing court did not have the option to resentence her to three years in community corrections upon finding a violation, but was instead required…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Walgreen Co. v. CharnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. Frank M. Hall & Co. v. NewsomSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  3. People v. FlennikenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  4. People v. WrightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  5. Beecroft v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. A.S. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
  2. In re People v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
  3. v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
  4. Meza v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  5. People v. WolfeColorado Court of Appeals · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API