Legal Opinion

Sugarman v. Kapu

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 2004No. 24090PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that, (1) read in pari materia, Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) §§ 668-1 (1993) and -14 (1993), relating to the partition of real property, vest the circuit court with equitable discretion in judicial sales of such property, to reopen bidding after public auction but before confirmation of the public auction bid and (2) the court’s rejection of confirmation of the highest bid submitted at a public auction does not require a showing that inadequacy of the bid amounted to fraud.

I

On October 5,1993, Plaintiff-Appellant Joseph Sugarman (Appellant) filed a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Franks v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In Re the Tax Appeal of Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Levy v. Broadway-Carmen Building Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Knauer v. FooteHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Siekert v. SoesterNebraska Supreme Court · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Narmore v. KawafuchiHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  2. 7's Enterprises, Inc. v. Del RosarioHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Kimura v. KamaloHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Association of Apartment Owners of Royal Aloha v. Certified Management, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. James McCarty v. Gcp Management, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API