Legal Opinion

Narmore v. Kawafuchi

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 2006No. 26812PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that (1) Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 232-17 (2001)1 and Rules of the *71Tax Appeal Court of the State of Hawai'i (RTAC) Rule 2(a),2 requiring Appellant-Appellant Bobby R. Narmore (Narmore) to serve a copy of his “Notice of Appeal to Tax Appeal Court” on Appellee-Appellee Kurt Kawafuchi, Director of the Department of Taxation, State of Hawai'i (the Department), is not jurisdictional and, hence, failure to comply with such language did not deprive the Tax Appeal Court (the tax court)3 of jurisdiction to hear Narmore’s appeal, inasmuch as (a) under the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. ToyomuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Gray v. Administrative Director of CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. KalamaHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In Re the Tax Appeal of Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Norris v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Derosa v. Association of Apartment Owners of the Golf VillasDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2016
  2. State v. ShannonHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  3. STYKE v. SoteloHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Tax Appeal of Kaheawa Wind Power, LLC v. County of MauiHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Aregger v. State, Department of TaxationHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API